Recently in videophone Category

VP-200 Breakdown

| 28 Comments

Anyone of you have an experience with malfunction with Sorenson's videophone - VP-100 & VP-200 and D-Link's DVC-1000 which it is impossible to get fixed and suggestion for the replacement?

My friend owns the working Sorenson VP-200 for four months old until somehow her videophone screen turned into bizarre static or glared video, never come back to normal. She tried to look for the solution through videophone user interface preferences on screen and around the physical hardware to figure this out and cannot find the solution. She decided to contact the Sorenson tech support through email to explain the issue about her videophone. They asked her the questions: fix the modem? Unplug the videophone? Or, the television is broken? She tried to explain clearly in plain English – static video comes from machine itself. She took six email attempts into four days with tech support about the videophone malfunction and they never took her words for requesting to replace a new videophone. She has an idea, decided to take evidence photos to send through email:

videophone-static.jpg

The tech support immediately followed this issue, and replaced her a brand new videophone VP-200. My friend is not very pleased with tech support for lack of expertise.

I am wondering how tech support is doing their job for wasting the time to listen the words from videophone users, and why does the tech support does not provide something different other than FAQ system, like asking for the picture to prove that videophone has malfunction?

The pictures are worth thousand, thousand of words.

Better to give AND Receive

| No Comments
csd-dlink.jpg
I received the email from Communication Service for the Deaf (CSD) Video Relay Services (VRS) or CSDVRS, the first paragraph stated:
CSDVRS is redistributing DLinks to people in need of a videophone. If you have a DLink you don’t use anymore, you can help those in need, and we’ll send you $25 as a bonus for your generosity.
It looks like CSD are losing the competition to Sorenson due upgrade hardware features like VP-200? I don't see CSD bringing out the upgrade DLink videophone hardware, just like Sorenson's VP-200 does. I went into web form to fill this out and instructions how to return DLink, and CSD will give the aged DLink videophone to deafies who are "far-behind" with technologies.

$25 dollar is better than nothing, I am going to push this for my time to send this aged Dlink videophone since I have newer hardware version of Sorenson's VP-200 with me.

Pittsburgh Sorenson VRS Open House

| No Comments
Sorenson Grand Open House

Today I went to see the open house for Sorenson VRS offices in Pittsburgh, PA to hire more interpreters to bring more productive the time with video relay service (VRS) through Sorenson videophone.

The people at Sorenson said not allowed taking any pictures inside Sorenson offices. Dang.

I toured around Sorenson small office, there are eight office cubes (not room). Each cube has VP-200 hidden beneath above the television and under the wooden shelf. Sadly, they are not allowed to show or touch VP-200 (physical full 360 view, inside and out.) It's even more sad that I can't see more detalis about VP-200.

I asked a question the Sorenson interpreter about the salary difference between interpreter (travel to meeting, activities, etc.) and its interpreter relay service. The interpreter woman said SAME. Hmm, does she tell her truthfully?

VP-200 Revealed

| 3 Comments
My friend referenced a link to deafbase.com forums to prove the next generation of videophone, here are the fully revealed:

Sorenson VP-200 Videophone features:
- Up to 30 fps H.261 or H.263 video performance
- H.323 or SIP compliant
- Network integration, including Ethernet and 802.11b chipset support available
- G.723.1, G.729, and G.711 audio support
- Full duplex acoustic echo cancellation
- Supports CMOS or CCD video input and NTSC or PAL video output (LCD support possible)
- Complete on screen user interface, supporting 256 color and transparency (customizable by OEM partner)
- Support for IR remote control and telephone interface
- Supports video display on standard television, plus full duplex speakerphone using TV speakers
- Linux operating system

Additional hosted services also integrate with Sorenson Media back-end services including:
- LDAP videophone number directory (provided at no cost of OEM or end customer)
- Automated firmware updated
- User profiles, allowing customization of each device to specific user simply by logging into the videophone
- Call tracking and accounting system

And here is the short movie clip of VP-200 user interface and videophone flashing:

VP-200 is Coming

| No Comments

Finally about time, the second version of Sorenson videophone will be available in summer 2006 or later. I knew in my mind VP-200 will replace my VP-100. Read the Grant's FAQ article about getting VP-200 if you don't want to watch signed TV or read on PDF through Sorenson official website.

I kept wondering myself Sorenson VP-200 features will have to offer. Here is my top five I would like to see:

1. Private Address stored through network server so we will never get lost address in case if videophone is broken.
2. Password protected. It's all about security.
3. View camera angle (horizontal & vertical) and zoom level. It can be flexible to place videophone any place closer or farther.
4. Accessories. The videophone can support above the flat-panel TV such as LCD and plasma
5. Additional Inputs/Outputs (composite, component, HDMI and S-Video). 16:9 would be nice, but will it sum up the bandwidth? I believe this will be a issue.

UPDATE (4/16/2006): VP-200 Revealed.

Sorenson, King of the VP?

| No Comments

Sorenson is giving away free their brand name device, videophone (VP) to deaf customers. The customers use Sorenson's only VRS (Video Relay Service) to call and blocked the third-party VRS providers to call from Sorenson VP device. Remember this?

Soon, not anymore. Effective July 1st 2006, Sorenson Communications allow the user to call interpreters of other VRS providers from Sorenson owned VP device. This is very good news for us, which are more efficient and easier to make phone calls through VRS.

I also have i2eye DVC-1000 and Sorenson VP-100 videophones. I chose VP-100 actively because there are high number of Deaf customers use Sorenson - the same format of VP address which is easier for us to call each other on same videophone model. Ask Alan.

The debate between DVC-1000 and VP-100 is becoming old news now. It's a shame for Communication Service for the Deaf (CSD) to outsmart the customer for switching CSD VRS service from ACME VRS (think of Sorenson VRS).

Videophone Router Troubles

| No Comments

My friend complained about their router and videophone:

I am using Verizon DSL line, with 2-in-1 box of modem and router, I have problem with this. I am able to sending (call) the people on videophone, but I am unable to open receive calls, but it can be saved the log in incoming calls (missed calls) to call them back. I am very frustrated with videophone calls.

I don't have the instruction manual book for the modem/router, and have troubling with Verizon customer service through email for understanding between their router and my videophone.

Videophone connecting several different kinds of the router for functionality through the network (such as IP, firewall, etc.) is not always perfect for all customers. For my question, does videophone work with all routers? How can I know if mine is compatible?

I went Sorenson knowledgebase site to find what router can be compatible with their videophone. They listed 30 names - not enough of brand and machine type that does work/not work with videophone(s).

I believe it needs take more analytics. Because of that, I went Nintendowifi.com site, and I am very impressed with their quality of service - they shown the numerous lists - over 100 wireless routers are compatibility with Nintendo DS WiFi to play wirelessly, and it keeps updating whenever newest wireless router comes out.

If you already own the router for several years and getting videophone that does not support the router - that means you have to be forced (not necessarily) to get router - any D-Link products that are compatibility with videophone. The videophone installer offer free D-Link wired router.

If you prefer to keep your router different from D-Link, you will have hard time to configure the settings for the router to get videophone working correctly.

FAQ about Videophone

| No Comments

My blog visitor, Cyndy sent her comment in my previous entry about Dlink and Sorenson Videophone debate, I answered her great questions:

Do you use the Sorenson's VP 100 or D-Link's DVC 1000 all the time? Which one is best VP?
I use Sorenson's VP-100 for now because of there are high capacity number of deaf people in Pittsburgh area use Sorenson and it is easier for me to use Sorenson's videophone number instead IP address. Sorenson has improved the relay service such as eliminating time-waiting list today. I still haven't say which is best because I haven't use D-Link DVC for long time.

I wonder if Sorenson call thru into the D-Link with connection for communicate on video. Is that working out thru or block the connection?
No. If you are Sorenson user to call D-Link user, you need their IP address to call this number. Also Sorenson user unable to call external video relay service such as Sprint Video Relay Service. D-Link user can call any video relay service - external and internal.

I read your storytelling about hackers on Sorenson use IP address, on names in VP Directory. I believe that's true about hackers can prey into the laptop or computer's folders or files. Could those lost anything or damage?
This is possible likely the hacker can find the IP address to access and hack the computer (not include the videophone.) It is mostly likely to be mischievous such as modify changes or delete the files on the computer if you did not set the security settings (such as ant-virus program, internet security) to protect your computer.

Thank you, Cyndy!

Letter to Sorenson

| No Comments

I recieved a message in Deaf forums, I thought I could post this here to share with you:

Sorenson Media
C/O Jim Sorenson
4393 South Riverboat Road, Suite 300
Salt Lake City, Utah 84123

Hi Jim Sorenson,

I'm still unhappy with your videophone device because it's impossible to call other Video Relay Service. I understand that you wanted us to use your Sorenson VRS. But still, it's NOT a quick connection and its very poor quality also while they mentioned that we were held up and it's shut down like a privacy wall. It's very rude and treated us like very low. It's unlike a regular TTY to make a connection with the relay service very quickly. I don't like Sorenson VRS to call me back, because whenever I'm done with other VRS through my computer's webcam. Afterward, the SVRS really pester repeats to call me and asked what numbers to call. I told them too late. I know that other VRS providers like SprintVRS that they have a very quick connection. And their quality is awesome, very professional and friendly. The SprintVRS installers are very honestly people to tell us the truth what Sorenson and Sprint have offered, I can see that Sprint employees are very neutral while Sorenson installer are telling us that DLINK VP is poor quality and have to use by IP address only and SVRS installers mentioned that DLINK VP does not use any telephone to call. Afterward, I learned a lot and realized that both have separated own database server... That's very shame. Now I'm telling you who were the responsibility?

You need to check out with Tom Scuderi your employee, he's been instructing us many wrong ways. I'm sick of the way, he called me a several times and tell me to use up SVRS MORE minutes which is not my fault that I couldn't be patient to wait for SVRS' response. I felt not privacy when Tom Scuderi told me how many minutes I have used so far. Also, I hav! e a very good friend of mine who works as SVRS installer under Tom, the installer told me how bad Tom talked the way to him like verbal abuses with swear words etc. I told him that's him the way he usually talks to me on videophone call. I told other my friends regarding to this issues. . So, I called SprintVRS and asked if they do usually check out that I'm using their VRS or not. They said it's against the FCC regulations. I'm really surprised about the difference. Everyone agreed with me.

I learned a lot that I still don't understand why you put us in a private gateway IP address; I have heard a lot that elderly Florida people have purchased the DLINK for their children which they can't reach kids by their VP numbers. What a waste of money. Other Deaf people have DLINK videophone; I still can't reach them by my VP numbers.

At last thing, You could improve your Sorenson VRS if only a few things are changed like " DLINK VP and VP 100" registered numbers merged into one data base server, that we all can be reached by VP numbers like the way, we have many different kind of TTY that can be always reached very simple. So, everyone will feel more peaceful. Tell Tom Scuderi to leave his customers alone. He's very unprofessional to tell us about other VRS. He should be neutral. You probably didn't know until now you read what I'm saying. Please be alerted that People prefer the freedom of choice. Let me warn you, next time I will put my VCR recording on if any SVRS calls me regarding to any illegal conversation. I would make it copied and be mailing to you and CC's to FCC's office.

I prefer myself to be a low profile; you may never know Deaf Community can be threatening to me.

Sincerely,
Florida Customer

CC's to Federal Communications Commission

I have seen similar incidents about this in my own eyes few months ago. Is Sorenson is about to blame? Also, Grant shared his thoughts in his entry, What's new about Video Relay Service (VRS) lately?. Also, I posted past entry about October 6th Videophone Debate: Sorenson vs DLink.

Videophone Debate: Sorenson vs DLink

| No Comments

As if you never heard the broadband videophone, please read the previous entry in my blog: VRS: Sorenson vs. Sprint & CSD before reading the entry below. Also, don't forget to read the comments after reading this entry in same page!

Now, I have been using DLink's DVC-1000 for 2 months since I put Sorenson VP-100 into dust. Been using DVC-1000, there is downside of DVC-1000 is the interface design - when I am not on call, I can see myself from self-view window full. When I get on call, the self-view window cuts in half - only I can view myself in the middle, but cannot view myself around borders of self view window. I know it is hard to explain, so I can give you an example of the picture below:

compare-dlink.jpg

Notice the DVC-1000 main window and self-view window? The caller can see your full screen window while on video phone and you cannot view the 100% self-view window on yourself. Also, Sorenson's VP-100 have full screen of main window and self-view window which DVC-1000 does not.

In video settings to change the brightness and contrast; DVC-1000 does not show the video window display while changing the video settings at same time on the screen. You have to make a guess to change how big or small the brightness and contrasts are, and then go back to main window screen to judge yourself to view the better video. If not, you have to go back to video settings to change it, and forth, vice versa. Sorenson's VP-100 also has video window display in video settings. The winner goes to Sorenson VP-100 over DLink's DVC-1000 for friendly interface environment.

There are biggest disadvantage for both DVC-1000 and VP-100: the address list can be store into the videophone. If they are damaged or destroyed, then all of the addresses contact list will be lost. My advice: Use your back-up plan to write down the paper for address lists, in case if something happens.

Well, a short-conclusion: which is better, DVC-1000 or VP-100? In my opinion, if I want better VRS service and doesn't care about better interface, I chose DLink's DVC-1000 over Sorenson's VP-100. You decide.

I have heard two different views between Sorenson and Dlink heating up with debates. I remember what people were saying about them; so I decide to share with you from their words:

  • We [Sorenson] went to Communication Services for the Deaf (CSD) headquarters few years ago to support out Sorenson VP-100. CSD reviewed this, and not support Sorenson because many people don't have broadband back in time. We decide to establish our own business to sell Sorenson VP-100. It became instant success. Now, CSD is too late and too stupid not supporting us.
  • We're [Sorenson] very smart business. We get profits from federal fund. We put the every record of user's time and location from caller making calls and using VRS. Sprint does not have like that.
  • Sprint collects the records from caller. The federal profits them.
  • Sprint is open to VRS for everybody. Sorenson does not. Sorenson block Sprint's VRS service, Sorenson uses their own VRS service. Also, Sorenson blocks from DLink's DVC-1000 users to call Sorenson's VRS.
  • Sorenson VP-100 has high compression video. Sprint does not.
  • The people were complaining that Sorenson block VRS outside of their network service. The FCC is invesating that Sorenson might be in monopoly.
  • Sorenson's VP-100 is designed in MIND for the deaf people. DLink's DVC-1000 is designed for the general public [hearing].
  • Sorenson can have any updates for VP-100 such as new features, software, and bugs, etc. DLink's DVC-1000 only have update support: bug fixing.
  • I [Sorenson installer] believe that DLink's DVC-1000 will be out of business.
  • I [DVC-1000 installer] believe that Sorenson will be out of business because they breaking FCC's rules. The FCC rule: the caller gets on relay service; they must wait for 30 seconds before making a call. Sorenson does not. Sorenson passed 30 seconds after making a call. Sorenson is breaking the law.
  • We [Sorenson] promised to have 24 hour, 7 days a week to have VRS service next month and hopefully to reduce the waiting times down under 5 minutes. We establish three new places in Atlanta, Nevada and --- to grow more interpreting services.
  • Sorenson is in deep pressure to hire more installer and set up more VP-100 users to beat us [DLink].
  • Sprint allows us to use IP address and phone numbers to calls. It is easy to establishment to using incoming and out coming ports. Sorenson is too complicated to establish and need to have installer to come and enjoy sitting on potato couch to watch installer to fix Sorenson's VP-100 problems.
  • Sorenson must require using Sorenson's phone numbers to call. If you use IP address, the hackers find your IP address and name in videophone online directory, Hackers can have more time to find and study to break through firewall and harm your computer.
  • Both of them are designed by Sorenson! In other words, whenever Sprint or other companies by the D-Link DVC-1000 videophone, they are BUYING Sorenson technology!
  • Sprint does charge customers for replacement/tech support. Sorenson tech support is priceless.
  • Dlink is going to stopped the product anytime soon or I am sure it already did.
  • I [DLink] believe Sorenson will be forced from court monopoly orders to open the out of network VRS calls or they will lose the money.

Whoa, Talk of offense between two debates. It's really difficult to say which have true facts, but time will tell.

Archives

Master Archives

What am I doing

    Tag cloud

    View All Tags

    SUBSCRIBE

    Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en